v1: Hananiah, a false prophet, made a public attack on Jeremiah; compare 20.1-6. Jeremiah endured a number of direct challenges to his ministry.
v2-4: Hananiah's words directly contradicted Jeremiah's, but doubtless his message would have been more popular. We may ask why he said these things; did he really believe them? Did he deliberately deceive? Did he want to give assurance to the people? Whatever his motives, he spoke untruth.
The specific content;
- the Lord would break the yoke of Babylon; contrast 27.12;
- the vessels of the temple and the people already exiled would be returned within 2 years; contrast 27.21-22.
- The return of Jehoiachin; contrast 22.24-27.
v5-6: Jeremiah wanted to believe Hananiah's words; perhaps he had prayed these same things. But he knew that the true message from God was quite different.
v7-9: Jeremiah's response was also in public. He began with an issue of principle, the testing of a prophet. The first test is whether his words come true. Whilst a prophecy of coming peace may bring some comfort, it may not be true.
v10-11: Jeremiah had been wearing a yoke, as in 27.2, symbolising his message. Here was real commitment to his calling, a willingness to fully embrace what he was bringing.
Contrast Hananiah's words with Jeremiah's in 27.14-15.
Jeremiah did not enter into a personal attack against Hananiah. He maintained a dignified silence, leaving God Himself to vindicate him. He simply “went on his way.”
v12-14: The new yoke of iron. There were those who sought to rebel against Babylon, as in 2 Kings 24.20, but that actually made matters worse.
v15-17: Judgment against Hananiah. His words were not just some slight theological difference, over which the learned might debate, but he made the people trust a lie, and he taught rebellion against the Lord. Hananiah's death was in fulfilment with Jeremiah's words, and provided fresh proof of his own calling.