Bible Notes Online - Ezra 4 - ESV
Commentary

v1-2: The offer of extra help from "the enemies of Judah and Benjamin". Whether or not the offer was genuine does not matter, for these people were Samaritans, brought into the area by Esarhaddon, king of Assyria (also v10). They had mixed true religion with false (2 Kings 17.24-41), but they did not truly fear the True God (2 Kings 17.34).

v3: Zerubbabel quite correctly turned down the offer. There is but one faith (Eph 4.5), and we are unwise to have those of a different faith serve with us (2 Cor 6.14).

v4-5: The enemies then troubled the people; they even went to the expense of hiring counsellors against them. In v12-16, accusations were brought against the Jewish people. We see here a range of satanic schemes and devilish devices, to discourage the people. 2 Cor 2.11 states that "we are not unaware of Satan's schemes".

This work continued through the reign of Cyrus, through the reigns of Xerxes (Cambyses) and Artaxerxes (Gaumata), and into the reign of Darius, a period of at least 8 years (529-521 B.C.). Satanic schemes to frustrate the work of Christ are not just short term, off-one incidents, but the settled decision of the master of evil.

v6-8: As soon as Artaxerxes became king, the letter of accusation was written to him. Presumably had the letter been written to Cyrus, he would have rejected its contents, since he had written the original command for the Jews to return to Jerusalem.

It seems that a number of letters were written, perhaps as one king died and another took his place.

v9-11: Since the enemies lived in Samaria, they could have attacked Jerusalem; any help from Persia would have arrived too late. It was clearly the Lord's overruling that this did not happen.

v12: The letter quoted here was sent by Rehum and Shimshai, as representatives of the enemies of Judah and Benjamin.

The letter began with words of emotive accusation, "that rebellious and wicked city". There were also lies, "they are restoring the walls"; the true situation was thus exaggerated.

v13: The accusation of disloyalty, that the Jews would cease to pay taxes.

v14: The enemies of Judah and Benjamin claimed loyalty to the king, although their motivation was more selfish.

v15: Ancient kingdoms maintained historical records, see Esth 2.23; 6.1. The letter urged the king to discover in those records evidence of Jerusalem's previous rebellions.

v16: The argument concluded with the claim that further progress would lessen the king's dominion on that side of the Euphrates. This statement may have been a deliberate lie, or a genuine fear of the Jews. The reason for the statement is clear, that the king would become prejudiced against the Jewish people.

v17-22: A reply was received following a search through the records. Evidence was found to support the accusations from Rehum and Shimshai. Indeed, not only was there evidence of rebellion from Jerusalem, but there was evidence that taxes were paid to mighty kings in Jerusalem. The kings of Persia would not want such kings to arise within its empire.

The Jews were given no opportunity to defend themselves, or to put their case. But life is not always fair; we do not expect the enemy of our souls to exercise any integrity.

Even in this letter was a future open door, "that this city will not be rebuilt until I so order"; so, construction work could be recommenced, as indeed it was later.

v23-24: The attacks of the enemy were successful, in that the work was stopped. The Lord God allowed this to happen; it was part of His greater purpose.