Bible Notes Online - Esther 3 - ESV
Commentary

v1: Haman was proud and ambitious; like Satan (whom he pictures), he was given great honour in the presence of the king (see Is 14.12-13). He was related to the Agagite; Agag the Amalekite had opposed Saul (1 Sam 15).

v2-4: Mordecai had refused to bow down before Haman; doubtless he would only worship God, "for he had told them he was a Jew".Mordecai took his stand; just as Joseph did before Potiphar's wife; and Daniel before Darius the King. Godly men maintaining integrity in pagan hostile environments.

v5-6: Haman's reaction was not just to kill Mordecai, but to destroy all the Jews. God's people had remained distinct, but they had also come to be feared (6.13).

v7: The timing of the lot (the pur), was also of God, since it gave Mordecai and Esther time and opportunity to reveal Haman's scheme to the king, and to save the Jewish people.

v8-9: Even in exile, the Jews remained a distinctive people, such that Haman could identify them by their customs. Haman was an enemy of the Jews, like Rehum in Ezra 4.12, and Sanballat in Neh 6.6. He covered his hatred by the accusation of rebellion and disobedience. He offered to provide money for those who would carry out the command, although the king turned down this offer. Haman's anti-Jewish sentiment starts to be exposed here - he used deceit and scheming to try to destroy a nation. See Dan 6.7-8 and Exodus 1.8-10 where similar attacks are made.

v10-11: Haman was evidently respected by the king, as he gave him the signet ring, with which he could seal any commands.

v12-14: The command was spread throughout the empire by couriers. Communication within the empire was also impressive, as in 1.3, 22.

The law of the king, by which men would die; this pictures the law by which we are condemned (Rom 7.9).

v15: The people of Susa were bewildered, because the Jews had not fostered rebellion. They had evidently been an accepted part of the community. Presumably other nations lived in harmony within the empire.