Bible Notes Online - Deuteronomy 23 - ESV
Commentary

v1-6: Some people were kept from the congregation of Israel. Although the individual was 'innocent' in that he had not chosen his circumstances, he would still be excluded. The overriding principle was that of holiness (Lev 11.15; Deut 22.9-11); a person's supposed 'personal rights' are not the issue.

In the N.T. a person becomes part of the church of Jesus Christ through faith in Jesus Christ. This is irrespective of his history, background, and the circumstances of his birth.

Emasculation was different from circumcision; the person was neither fruitful nor pure.

Illegitimacy implies parental rebellion; a household acting against God and His standards.

Belonging to another god, since these nations followed false religion which opposed Israel, through Balaam. Such was God's grace, however, that Ruth the Moabite could enter the congregation.

v4-5: The prohibition for Ammonites and Moabites had a clear historical reason. These peoples, although Semitic, refused to give bread and water to Israel, and hired Balaam against Israel. Again, God's love for His own was such that the schemes of Balaam were overturned.

v7-8: Edomites were to be treated differently. There was more opportunity for them to enter the congregation. Here too is the concept of ‘conversion,’ whereby a person might join the congregation of God’s people.

v9-13: In everyday life the Israelites had to maintain purity and holiness. This meant that an individual was kept outside the camp (v10-11). A toilet area was also to be maintained outside the camp (v12-13).

v14: If God is to walk amongst us, should we not be careful how we live!

v15-16:   Slaves should always have a welcome amongst God’s people, since they had previously been slaves in Egypt.

v19-20: Interest on a debt could be charged to an outsider, but not to a brother.

v21-23: Although vows were not obligatory, where a vow was taken, the person had to fulfil it. Our words are to be faithful and true.

v24-25: Kindness to others. A farmer allowed his neighbour to pick a little corn, or gather a few grapes. This was not considered stealing. The visitor had no right to harvest the grain of the grapes.

In Mark 2.23 the disciples plucked ears of corn in this way; this could not be considered as work on the Sabbath day, as they were not harvesting. The Pharisees' complaint was therefore groundless.