Bible Notes Online - Luke 20 - ESV
Commentary

v1-2: Jesus was teaching daily in the temple courts. He described the temple as "my house". The question came; What right had He to do this? This was part of the plan to destroy Him, as well as a challenge to His authority.

v3-4: Jesus' response was not a direct answer to the question, since He knew their hearts, but He left His hearers in no doubt as to the answer. His question allowed only one answer, but the leaders refused to accept the obvious.

v5-8: The scribes' and priests' unwillingness to answer was a demonstration of their unwillingness to believe in Jesus as the Christ.

v9: The parable of the vine-dressers, another parable of Israel's rejection of Christ. The farmer should have received his share of the produce as rent. The vineyard speak of Israel, see Is 5.1-7. The parable is addressed to the people in general, for Israel was a nation was guilty of unbelief.

v10-12: The farmer expected fruit, looking for righteousness and justice, but seeing only bloodshed and distress. Those servants, the prophets sent by God, were treated badly, see 11.47-49.

v13: The owner of the vineyard sent his son. The meaning is clear; God has sent His Son.

The parable also indicates God's long-suffering and patience towards His rebellious people. Judgment, although deserved, was long deferred; 2 Pet 3.9.

v14-15: The vine-dressers killed the son, thinking that the inheritance would become theirs. Jewish inheritance laws did allow land to pass from landlord to tenant in certain circumstances, but not by murder.

v16: The answer, see Rom 11.17; those listening to Jesus seemed to think that the vine-dressers' scheme would be successful.

v17-19: Jesus looked directly at them, for He had told this parable against the religious leaders in particular. They were angry but not repentant, the wicked vine-dressers. They were not willing to fall humbly on Christ.

Jesus' later teaching about the end times, in chapter 21, must be seen in this context of the Jews' rejection of Him.

v20: Jesus was in Jerusalem, where He encountered the greatest opposition. The religious leaders brought questions to trick Him and to destroy Him. Jesus wisely turned each one around to teach pertinent truths.

Luke perceptively comments that they pretended to be honest (or righteous); contrast Matt 22.15 and Mark 12.13. They were wolves in sheep's clothing, trying to deceive the shepherd.

v21-22: The first question was introduced with a claim of respect for Jesus. The question, 'Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar?' The question would have put most in a quandary; if He had said that it was wrong to pay taxes to Caesar, He would have been accused to Pilate as a rebel; had He said it was proper to pay taxes, He would have been seen as disloyal to the Jewish people.

v23: Again, Luke adds a comment, "He saw through their duplicity". The same word appears in 2 Cor 11.3 to describe Satan's subtlety.

v24-25: The answer is clear, pay taxes to whom taxes are due, but give honour to whom honour is due, see 1 Pet 2.17. We live in a world of temporal rulers, kings and governors, to whom we must give proper respect.

v26: Luke rejoices as he writes of another victory for Christ. The writer himself is amazed and awe-struck at the subject of his gospel.

v27-33: The second question concerned the resurrection.

The question was both hypothetical and ridiculous. The Sadducees attempted to defend their own false doctrine by making the alternative look ridiculous. Since they denied the truth of resurrection, Jesus took the opportunity to declare something of this important truth.

It is striking that, even amongst the supposed-faithful, there were those who denied the faith.

v34-38: Jesus' answer emphasises the truth of the resurrection, and that it was taught in the O.T. The Lord's answer must have been convincing, otherwise the Sadducees would have brought their own response.

v39-40: There was rivalry between the different religious groups, as in Acts 23.6-8. One group rejoiced as another was silenced.

v41: The third question was from Jesus, about Christ the son of David.

v42-44: Jesus quoted from Psalm 110. He states that the son of David was also David's Lord. This paradox (as in Rom 1.3-4; a descendant of David, and the Son of God; and Rev 22.16, the Root and Offspring of David) can only be explained with accepting that Jesus was fully man and fully God. This mystery was not explained to the crowds.

A few weeks later, Peter quoted the same Psalm, Acts 2.34. What wisdom to use the Lord's own words of Himself.

v45-47: The teachers of the law (scribes) sought glory from men, by doing their good deeds in public, by wearing grand clothes (see Num 15.38). Their punishment will be most severe. Jesus was consistently critical of the attitude that made a great show, but had no real devotion. During His ministry, His strongest condemnation was for the hypocrite.